Eyewitness testimony.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The criminal justice system relies heavily on eyewitness identification for investigating and prosecuting crimes. Psychology has built the only scientific literature on eyewitness identification and has warned the justice system of problems with eyewitness identification evidence. Recent DNA exoneration cases have corroborated the warnings of eyewitness identification researchers by showing that mistaken eyewitness identification was the largest single factor contributing to the conviction of these innocent people. We review major developments in the experimental literature concerning the way that various factors relate to the accuracy of eyewitness identification. These factors include characteristics of the witness, characteristics of the witnessed event, characteristics of testimony, lineup content, lineup instructions, and methods of testing. Problems with the literature are noted with respect to both the relative paucity of theory and the scarcity of base-rate information from actual cases.
منابع مشابه
Eyewitness testimony research: Current knowledge and emergent controversies
Psychological research on eyewitness testimony has flourished over the last decade and there are now a number of findings that appear relevant to police and courts. We review some of the major eyewitness research findings regarding such things as the relationship between accuracy and confidence, the identification of perpetrators from lineups, and the influence of misleading information on eyew...
متن کاملAn Examination of the Causes and Solutions to Eyewitness Error
Eyewitness error is one of the leading causes of wrongful convictions. In fact, the American Psychological Association estimates that one in three eyewitnesses make an erroneous identification. In this review, we look briefly at some of the causes of eyewitness error. We examine what jurors, judges, attorneys, law officers, and experts from various countries know about eyewitness testimony and ...
متن کاملEyewitness Identification What Can a Psychologist Tell a Jury?
Psychologists have long been concerned about the use of eyewitness testimony in the courtroom. Recently, it has been suggested that experimental psychologists should testify as expert witnesses in cases involving eyewitnesses to inform the jury about problems with eyewitness testimony. In this article we examine the arguments offered in favor of the use of expert testimony about eyewitnesses. W...
متن کاملNeuroimaging and Eyewitness Testimony
This paper will explore how breakthroughs in neuroscience, specifically neuroimaging, can be used to validate eyewitness testimony. Though the use of direct evidence is decreasing, due to findings of numerous wrongful convictions that were based on eyewitness testimonies, it is still an element of many criminal trials today. Cross-examination is used to validate eyewitness testimony because mem...
متن کاملA case study of eyewitness memory of a crime.
Another post with A Case Study Of Eyewitness Memory Of A Crime : a case study of eyewitness memory of a crime duljc a case study of eyewitness memory of a crime kqhpb a case study of eyewitness memory of a crime nsctd a case study of eyewitness memory of a crime leykw 10 u eyewitness testimony somsd.k12.nj eyewitness memory of a supermarket robbery: a case study eyewitness memory for vehicles m...
متن کاملLegal Professionals' Knowledge of Eyewitness Testimony in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey
PURPOSE To examine legal professionals' knowledge of a wide range of factors that affect eyewitness accuracy in China. METHODS A total of 812 participants, including 210 judges, 244 prosecutors, 202 police officers, and 156 defense attorneys, were asked to respond to 12 statements about eyewitness testimony and 3 basic demographic questions (i.e., gender, age, and prior experience). RESULTS...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Annual review of psychology
دوره 54 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003